Politicians.
Re: Politicians.
i mean SERIOUSLY now... when ilearned you need a "license" to own a "adult pellet rifle" that anything mroe than a childs TOY isnt allowed full grown adults, without permits and permissions and all that nonsense? really, its ridiculous.
i can walk out my door with a 30-06 and go target shooting or hunting lots of places as long as i am not trespassing on posted property... i legally carry a 357 or my 45 in my car for a trip if i feel like it, i dont need a reason, as i have a "carry license".
law abiding citizens? and hunters? arent "the problem"...
i can walk out my door with a 30-06 and go target shooting or hunting lots of places as long as i am not trespassing on posted property... i legally carry a 357 or my 45 in my car for a trip if i feel like it, i dont need a reason, as i have a "carry license".
law abiding citizens? and hunters? arent "the problem"...
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
in ALL the years of your experiment in "gunless society"?? ever notice violent crime STILL exists? the only thing you have eliminated is the law abiding citizens right to protect himself...
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
Sedders, just give it time and I'll guarantee the States will be the same as here. Eventually you'll lose the right to shoot wherever, you'll lose the right to carry, you'll lose the right to just go in to a shop and buy whatever you fancy.
It's already started over there, various states are closing trails to atv's, others are limiting use and making you pay through the nose for the privilege. Didn't the nra just have a fight on their hands over some firearms ruling that was going to be brought in?
Time, give it time.
It's already started over there, various states are closing trails to atv's, others are limiting use and making you pay through the nose for the privilege. Didn't the nra just have a fight on their hands over some firearms ruling that was going to be brought in?
Time, give it time.
"Land Rover, the worlds best 4x4 by far"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
Re: Politicians.
Sedders,
In the UK, we don't have a "gunless" society and this link gives the number of shotguns and firearms in England and Wales https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... march-2015 add another 15% to those numbers to allow for Scotland and Northern Ireland and you'll get a fairly accurate total for the whole of the UK
It's also not an "experiment" - laws controlling ownership and use of shotguns and firearms go back to 1508 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_ ... ed_Kingdom
Of course gun crime still exists in the UK - and virtually all of it is committed with illegally held firearms (primarily handguns)
However, which ever way you want to measure it - total number of crimes or crimes per head of population, the level of violent crime in the USA far exceeds that in the UK.
This link provides the statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... death_rate
Firearms deaths per 100,000 population per year: USA 10.54, UK 0.23 - that makes it 45.8 times more likely to be killed by a firearm in the USA than in the UK
Guns per hundred inhabitants: USA 112.6, UK 6.6
The second number goes a long way to explaining the first
Whatever you think of the strictness of UK gun laws, the fact is, that in general, they are effective in limiting the number of firearms in circulation and that has a big effect on keeping gun crime relatively uncommon in the UK.
Cheers
Bruce
In the UK, we don't have a "gunless" society and this link gives the number of shotguns and firearms in England and Wales https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... march-2015 add another 15% to those numbers to allow for Scotland and Northern Ireland and you'll get a fairly accurate total for the whole of the UK
It's also not an "experiment" - laws controlling ownership and use of shotguns and firearms go back to 1508 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_ ... ed_Kingdom
Of course gun crime still exists in the UK - and virtually all of it is committed with illegally held firearms (primarily handguns)
However, which ever way you want to measure it - total number of crimes or crimes per head of population, the level of violent crime in the USA far exceeds that in the UK.
This link provides the statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... death_rate
Firearms deaths per 100,000 population per year: USA 10.54, UK 0.23 - that makes it 45.8 times more likely to be killed by a firearm in the USA than in the UK
Guns per hundred inhabitants: USA 112.6, UK 6.6
The second number goes a long way to explaining the first
Whatever you think of the strictness of UK gun laws, the fact is, that in general, they are effective in limiting the number of firearms in circulation and that has a big effect on keeping gun crime relatively uncommon in the UK.
Cheers
Bruce
LAND ROVER - THE WORLD'S WORST 4X4 BY FAR
Re: Politicians.
criminals? do NOT like armed law abiding citizens one bit...
==========================================
now, the terrorists? sure, they ran some planes into some buildings... they set off a bomb or two here and there... but? you will notce we DONT have roving bands of muslims, molesting women in the subways and streets... we DONT have "sharia patrols" yelling and harassing people for going to pub and whatnot... i wonder why that is? hm?
you see... socialism and liberalism? is all over europe, you are up tp you neck in it... nanny states. you have become convinced how "safe" and how "civilized" you are? think nothing of the kind... you are only "safe" in the LINERAL sense...
we are "safer" in the real sense of it? here in america? because if the roving bands of muslims tried to take over our streets liek that? they would "molest" maybe 10 women? before one of the women pulled out a 357 rvolver and emptied 5 shots into the muslim mans chest... legally, i might add. they will probably pin a medal on the girl, not try to get "compensations" for the criminal out of her
then? that wont get tried again, they will go back to the bomb idea, which really just scares people and accomplished nothing.
=================================================
its not the wild west here... we are taught to call the police when trouble breaks out violently... but, until the police arrive? we are supposed to defend ourselves and protect ourselves as best we can. we are allowed to try and RESIST robbers and rapists, we arent expected to "do whatever they want" if we dont want to,
now... sure... if you are RICH and ELITE? you live somewhere safe and oh-so-civilized... which is where our "linerals" come from... college campuses and rich areas...
when you aren not rich? and you live in a bad area? why are you supposed to be helples against criminals? its insane....
==========================================================
"gun control"? is the idea that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose? is somehow "morally superior" to a women explaining to the police how many times she SHOT the attempted rapist.
the pansy liberals can do what they want to... i'm not giving the criminals my money, i'm not letting them raid my boss's cash register, i welcome them to try to kick my door in at 4am, i feel sorry for them if they make that mistake.
==============================
in the end? theres no changing anyones stance... you have been brainwashed from birth to think the liberal and socialistic way you think... and while we have troops of them here too? we also have plenty of people who think the OTHER way... every so many years? they educate everyone and head it off at the pass.
i honestly dont see how handing over your wallet to any criminal that asked for it teaches them not to do it. i dont see how inviting criminals to ron the cash register at work is the best way of protecting the money. no one sees how women and teenage girls lowing a whistle is supposed to stop a rape. I cant imagine living anywhere the police tell me i should lay down and ball up when i am physically attacked on the street.
then? you WONDER why roving bands of muslims think they can go out in groups and grab women and molest them in public... gee, i wonder why they thought that would be a fun thing to do? thats a stumper, isnt it?
==========================================
now, the terrorists? sure, they ran some planes into some buildings... they set off a bomb or two here and there... but? you will notce we DONT have roving bands of muslims, molesting women in the subways and streets... we DONT have "sharia patrols" yelling and harassing people for going to pub and whatnot... i wonder why that is? hm?
you see... socialism and liberalism? is all over europe, you are up tp you neck in it... nanny states. you have become convinced how "safe" and how "civilized" you are? think nothing of the kind... you are only "safe" in the LINERAL sense...
we are "safer" in the real sense of it? here in america? because if the roving bands of muslims tried to take over our streets liek that? they would "molest" maybe 10 women? before one of the women pulled out a 357 rvolver and emptied 5 shots into the muslim mans chest... legally, i might add. they will probably pin a medal on the girl, not try to get "compensations" for the criminal out of her
then? that wont get tried again, they will go back to the bomb idea, which really just scares people and accomplished nothing.
=================================================
its not the wild west here... we are taught to call the police when trouble breaks out violently... but, until the police arrive? we are supposed to defend ourselves and protect ourselves as best we can. we are allowed to try and RESIST robbers and rapists, we arent expected to "do whatever they want" if we dont want to,
now... sure... if you are RICH and ELITE? you live somewhere safe and oh-so-civilized... which is where our "linerals" come from... college campuses and rich areas...
when you aren not rich? and you live in a bad area? why are you supposed to be helples against criminals? its insane....
==========================================================
"gun control"? is the idea that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose? is somehow "morally superior" to a women explaining to the police how many times she SHOT the attempted rapist.
the pansy liberals can do what they want to... i'm not giving the criminals my money, i'm not letting them raid my boss's cash register, i welcome them to try to kick my door in at 4am, i feel sorry for them if they make that mistake.
==============================
in the end? theres no changing anyones stance... you have been brainwashed from birth to think the liberal and socialistic way you think... and while we have troops of them here too? we also have plenty of people who think the OTHER way... every so many years? they educate everyone and head it off at the pass.
i honestly dont see how handing over your wallet to any criminal that asked for it teaches them not to do it. i dont see how inviting criminals to ron the cash register at work is the best way of protecting the money. no one sees how women and teenage girls lowing a whistle is supposed to stop a rape. I cant imagine living anywhere the police tell me i should lay down and ball up when i am physically attacked on the street.
then? you WONDER why roving bands of muslims think they can go out in groups and grab women and molest them in public... gee, i wonder why they thought that would be a fun thing to do? thats a stumper, isnt it?
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
Sedders,
You've been watching too much Fox News (or Fu*ks news as it's known here)
We don't have roaming bands of any kind of criminals or religious nut cases on the streets here.
By the standards of American politics I would indeed be a liberal and vote democrat, but in the UK I vote conservative - I have no time for socialism - it's a failed political philosophy - I'm a believer in capitalism and small government.
I honestly believe I'm safer in the UK with a much smaller chance of being a victim of violent crime than I would be in the USA and the statistics prove that in spades.
We have a right to defend ourselves when attacked, but any response we make to an attack must be proportionate to the level of violence to which we are subjected. if someone punches me in the nose and I stab him to death with a knife, then i'm in deep shit. If he comes at me with a knife and I stab him to death then it's a clear case of self defense.
I agree on one thing - there's little or no chance of changing anyone's stance, so let's leave it at that.
Cheers
Bruce
You've been watching too much Fox News (or Fu*ks news as it's known here)
We don't have roaming bands of any kind of criminals or religious nut cases on the streets here.
By the standards of American politics I would indeed be a liberal and vote democrat, but in the UK I vote conservative - I have no time for socialism - it's a failed political philosophy - I'm a believer in capitalism and small government.
I honestly believe I'm safer in the UK with a much smaller chance of being a victim of violent crime than I would be in the USA and the statistics prove that in spades.
We have a right to defend ourselves when attacked, but any response we make to an attack must be proportionate to the level of violence to which we are subjected. if someone punches me in the nose and I stab him to death with a knife, then i'm in deep shit. If he comes at me with a knife and I stab him to death then it's a clear case of self defense.
I agree on one thing - there's little or no chance of changing anyone's stance, so let's leave it at that.
Cheers
Bruce
LAND ROVER - THE WORLD'S WORST 4X4 BY FAR
Re: Politicians.
one of our founding fathers put it best...
"those who would trade 'liberty' for 'safety'? Deserve neither."
i guess thats you and your country then, and thats your choice... well, actually its your leaders choice, they can do whatever they feel like it to you...
quite frankly? i really dont know what your constitution says or what you call what i call my constitution... my constitution? specifically states that we th people are allowed to overthrow our government by force if they take too much upon themselves.
=============================================
here, let me explain the difference, between being a "subject: and being a :citizen". My ex wife? is a lawyer working in state government, not the main faderal government. In my states capitol.... they had a thing, where a LAW was passed?? where the lawmakers couldnt give themselves a pay raise with a stroke of a pen. The smarmy little cucks? weaseled a way to give themselves a pay raise anyways, and get expense accounts and such. I mena, right in our faces.It was the "midnight pay raise" scandal, because the little weasels held an "all night" lawmaking session to try to get away with it.
they were taking too much ipon themselves, as it were. A couple hundred people? got P!$$ed... and surrounded the states capitol. Big loud demonstrations. screaming for blood. they had "wanted posters" of the lawmakers that weaseled this out, thought they were smug.
i had to drive out to see it for myself, it was BEAUTIFUL... the lawmakers on the wanted posters? were COWERING in their offices, afraid to show their faces out of doors to get to their fancy cars, or even to look out the windows.
one of the "pigs" as the crowd was calling them? instructed the "capitoal police" to march RIGHT out there, and inform THOSE people? that their "license to have a demonstration" was "revoked"!!! i mean hey, why not? hes a BIG WHIG, right? why, he can just revoke a permit, and they should disperse immediately.
you know what the captain of the capitol police said? (my ex wife was there with them...)
"sir? i dont think thats a very good idea right now..."
because the crowd was mad, and getting unruly... if you were on their list? they had the photos of the "pig lawmakers"?? the first one they saw, they came chanting "pork chops! pork chops!" and chased him BACK into the capitol building.
took 2 or 3 days to negotiate the whole thing down...
====================================================
now, you call that uncivilized, i am sure... here in america? we call that "freedom".
Our government? has to ask our permission to do anything, or at least they are supposed to... right now? they are being "reminded of that" with hearings. PLenty of illegal shenanigans went on the last 8 years? with the "liberal" administration that thinks just like you think? "well, they will do it to you eventually, what can you do?"
thats why the HEAD of the FBI, the CIA, the IRS... anda whole list of others? are squirming right now. (look up "gowdy" and "chaffetz" on you tube... see the hearings, watch them squirm)
they THOUGHT they were going to "ignore" the congressional hearings, and ignore subpoenas, and "black out" all the subpoenased documents as "secret"... uh uh... they are getting their @$$reamed out for all of that right now.
=====================================================
because the government has to reign them in? because if they go too far? thinking "ah, we just pass a regulation... whgatever..." we will SURROUND their building and we dont just "disperse" when we are told to...
and another thing about this freedom? if we all surround our COUNTRYS CAPITOL and refuse to disperse? its getting unruly? bullhorns? the lawmakers are scared to come out?
they CANT call in the national army... they are not ALLOWED to march against AMERICAN CITIZENS... our national government? is deliberately not a "state" where theres a "governor" that CAN call up troops at his command... if enough peole assemble? and the police cant disperse them? you are stuck like chuck... and you would have to NEGOTIATE with the people assembled.
=======================================
now, all across europe? this probably all sounds like craziness to you. "why... why... thats not civilized!"
yes, its very civilized... our government? answers to US, not the other way around. I would say "you should try it sometime", but... i guess you gave up those rights a long time ago, or, your kings and queens never "gave you" those rights so you never had them...
we were specifically created, NOT to have to deal with that. My government? on some basic level, fears the people. Which is as it should be. Thats SPECIFICALLY why "we the people" have a right to be ARMED, and you cant take that right away. It gives the "right to assemble to redress grievances with the ruling bodies" a little more TEETH, so its not just words, and signs, and slogans.
==========================================
now, compare that to your system. your elected leaders" will do about anything they sign their pen to, and what are you going to do about it? not much... they just bring in troops and fire hoses and wash you down the street. Not content with whatever screw job your OWN governments give you already?? you guys all went out and found ANOTHER ruling body,the EU... who now sits somewhere ina country not your own, and strokes the pen and holds meetings, and passes laws for your own country! and your government comes to you "oh, gee whiz, the EU says this, the EU says that... sorry, nothing to be done about it. pen has been put to paper you know."
=========================================
during 8 year sof the Obama administration? with Hillary Clinton the foreign diplomatic arse kisser abroad?? they signed "documents" at the U.N.
they made it "legal" for the UN to decide about gun rights, and foreign troops could come in and confiscate weapons on USA sol... because they do not have the "federal troops" that are allowed to do their bidding, and for good reason.
you know what? its just words on some UN papers, aint worth toilet paper. you let me KNOW when you locate these troops that are going to land on our soil, and go door to door, confiscating our guns. Gun owners will just laugh at them...
=========================================
now, you might say, becauee you have been brainwashed by having RULERS and liberalism? "oh, thats all tough words... i'd like to see you try it" you already SAW IT HAPPEN. the "ferguson riots"...
did you notice? the local police were scared to "do anything"? in america? during a demonstration? they know better... the proper thing to do was what they did do, which is to request the governor to call in the STATE TROOPS to restore order. which they evetually did. NOW, i will tell you straight off? i think the ferguson riots were "stupid" and for a "stupid reason"
BUT... though i hate what you say or do? i will defend to the death you right to do it.
HAD those crowds overwhelmed the state troops? even went so far as to march on the capitol there were enough of them? overthrow the state government? Thats FINE and DANDY... there ARE NO federal troops coming in to "save the state". You are on your own with "we the people".
if they had been MAD enough, and organized enough, and determined enough? they mkight well have overthrown the state government. our federal government than has to NEGOTIATE with them, and CANT send i the federal troops. its not an option. They could have dispersed the state government, elected new leaders and state laws, and re-wrote the state constitution form scratch.
that is their right to do so. And though i think its a retarded reason FOR a riot? i applaud them doing it... it reminds our fearless leaders exactly who works for who.
NOW, the state is not allowed to invade another state... federal troops then can and will come in and crush them... the state or states cant "secede from the union" or again, they get crished by federal troops. But, short of that? ha ha... itsa STATE MATTER. and if enough people come for the state government? and overwhelm the relatively FEW state troops? thats our RIGHTS to do so.
========================================================
so? yeah... theres a few school shootings, a few loonies shoot up a few movie theatres. Not a big deal in the overall scheme of things.
==================================================
thus endeth the lesson, on the exact difference between being a "subject" and being a "citizen"
the ultimate authority and POWER in america? resides in "we the people"... not some pansy lawmakers who might get too big for their britches, putting broad strokes of pen to paper, taking on things above their pay grade.
so, in final summation? i know your "safety" lecture sounds wonderful. your "numbers" might well be all correct.
but... like in australia? a big gunshooting took place, then all manner of changes occurred? here in america? we're not supposed to allow "one incident" to allow the government to come in and take rights away... they might be using that one incident as an "excuse"
"those who would trade 'liberty' for 'safety'? Deserve neither."
i guess thats you and your country then, and thats your choice... well, actually its your leaders choice, they can do whatever they feel like it to you...
quite frankly? i really dont know what your constitution says or what you call what i call my constitution... my constitution? specifically states that we th people are allowed to overthrow our government by force if they take too much upon themselves.
=============================================
here, let me explain the difference, between being a "subject: and being a :citizen". My ex wife? is a lawyer working in state government, not the main faderal government. In my states capitol.... they had a thing, where a LAW was passed?? where the lawmakers couldnt give themselves a pay raise with a stroke of a pen. The smarmy little cucks? weaseled a way to give themselves a pay raise anyways, and get expense accounts and such. I mena, right in our faces.It was the "midnight pay raise" scandal, because the little weasels held an "all night" lawmaking session to try to get away with it.
they were taking too much ipon themselves, as it were. A couple hundred people? got P!$$ed... and surrounded the states capitol. Big loud demonstrations. screaming for blood. they had "wanted posters" of the lawmakers that weaseled this out, thought they were smug.
i had to drive out to see it for myself, it was BEAUTIFUL... the lawmakers on the wanted posters? were COWERING in their offices, afraid to show their faces out of doors to get to their fancy cars, or even to look out the windows.
one of the "pigs" as the crowd was calling them? instructed the "capitoal police" to march RIGHT out there, and inform THOSE people? that their "license to have a demonstration" was "revoked"!!! i mean hey, why not? hes a BIG WHIG, right? why, he can just revoke a permit, and they should disperse immediately.
you know what the captain of the capitol police said? (my ex wife was there with them...)
"sir? i dont think thats a very good idea right now..."
because the crowd was mad, and getting unruly... if you were on their list? they had the photos of the "pig lawmakers"?? the first one they saw, they came chanting "pork chops! pork chops!" and chased him BACK into the capitol building.
took 2 or 3 days to negotiate the whole thing down...
====================================================
now, you call that uncivilized, i am sure... here in america? we call that "freedom".
Our government? has to ask our permission to do anything, or at least they are supposed to... right now? they are being "reminded of that" with hearings. PLenty of illegal shenanigans went on the last 8 years? with the "liberal" administration that thinks just like you think? "well, they will do it to you eventually, what can you do?"
thats why the HEAD of the FBI, the CIA, the IRS... anda whole list of others? are squirming right now. (look up "gowdy" and "chaffetz" on you tube... see the hearings, watch them squirm)
they THOUGHT they were going to "ignore" the congressional hearings, and ignore subpoenas, and "black out" all the subpoenased documents as "secret"... uh uh... they are getting their @$$reamed out for all of that right now.
=====================================================
because the government has to reign them in? because if they go too far? thinking "ah, we just pass a regulation... whgatever..." we will SURROUND their building and we dont just "disperse" when we are told to...
and another thing about this freedom? if we all surround our COUNTRYS CAPITOL and refuse to disperse? its getting unruly? bullhorns? the lawmakers are scared to come out?
they CANT call in the national army... they are not ALLOWED to march against AMERICAN CITIZENS... our national government? is deliberately not a "state" where theres a "governor" that CAN call up troops at his command... if enough peole assemble? and the police cant disperse them? you are stuck like chuck... and you would have to NEGOTIATE with the people assembled.
=======================================
now, all across europe? this probably all sounds like craziness to you. "why... why... thats not civilized!"
yes, its very civilized... our government? answers to US, not the other way around. I would say "you should try it sometime", but... i guess you gave up those rights a long time ago, or, your kings and queens never "gave you" those rights so you never had them...
we were specifically created, NOT to have to deal with that. My government? on some basic level, fears the people. Which is as it should be. Thats SPECIFICALLY why "we the people" have a right to be ARMED, and you cant take that right away. It gives the "right to assemble to redress grievances with the ruling bodies" a little more TEETH, so its not just words, and signs, and slogans.
==========================================
now, compare that to your system. your elected leaders" will do about anything they sign their pen to, and what are you going to do about it? not much... they just bring in troops and fire hoses and wash you down the street. Not content with whatever screw job your OWN governments give you already?? you guys all went out and found ANOTHER ruling body,the EU... who now sits somewhere ina country not your own, and strokes the pen and holds meetings, and passes laws for your own country! and your government comes to you "oh, gee whiz, the EU says this, the EU says that... sorry, nothing to be done about it. pen has been put to paper you know."
=========================================
during 8 year sof the Obama administration? with Hillary Clinton the foreign diplomatic arse kisser abroad?? they signed "documents" at the U.N.
they made it "legal" for the UN to decide about gun rights, and foreign troops could come in and confiscate weapons on USA sol... because they do not have the "federal troops" that are allowed to do their bidding, and for good reason.
you know what? its just words on some UN papers, aint worth toilet paper. you let me KNOW when you locate these troops that are going to land on our soil, and go door to door, confiscating our guns. Gun owners will just laugh at them...
=========================================
now, you might say, becauee you have been brainwashed by having RULERS and liberalism? "oh, thats all tough words... i'd like to see you try it" you already SAW IT HAPPEN. the "ferguson riots"...
did you notice? the local police were scared to "do anything"? in america? during a demonstration? they know better... the proper thing to do was what they did do, which is to request the governor to call in the STATE TROOPS to restore order. which they evetually did. NOW, i will tell you straight off? i think the ferguson riots were "stupid" and for a "stupid reason"
BUT... though i hate what you say or do? i will defend to the death you right to do it.
HAD those crowds overwhelmed the state troops? even went so far as to march on the capitol there were enough of them? overthrow the state government? Thats FINE and DANDY... there ARE NO federal troops coming in to "save the state". You are on your own with "we the people".
if they had been MAD enough, and organized enough, and determined enough? they mkight well have overthrown the state government. our federal government than has to NEGOTIATE with them, and CANT send i the federal troops. its not an option. They could have dispersed the state government, elected new leaders and state laws, and re-wrote the state constitution form scratch.
that is their right to do so. And though i think its a retarded reason FOR a riot? i applaud them doing it... it reminds our fearless leaders exactly who works for who.
NOW, the state is not allowed to invade another state... federal troops then can and will come in and crush them... the state or states cant "secede from the union" or again, they get crished by federal troops. But, short of that? ha ha... itsa STATE MATTER. and if enough people come for the state government? and overwhelm the relatively FEW state troops? thats our RIGHTS to do so.
========================================================
so? yeah... theres a few school shootings, a few loonies shoot up a few movie theatres. Not a big deal in the overall scheme of things.
==================================================
thus endeth the lesson, on the exact difference between being a "subject" and being a "citizen"
the ultimate authority and POWER in america? resides in "we the people"... not some pansy lawmakers who might get too big for their britches, putting broad strokes of pen to paper, taking on things above their pay grade.
so, in final summation? i know your "safety" lecture sounds wonderful. your "numbers" might well be all correct.
but... like in australia? a big gunshooting took place, then all manner of changes occurred? here in america? we're not supposed to allow "one incident" to allow the government to come in and take rights away... they might be using that one incident as an "excuse"
Last edited by sedstar on 15 Apr 2017, 23:52, edited 1 time in total.
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
oh shite...
i'm sorry, i posted after your post to not say anything. sorry about that...
but, you can still see the reasoning why a few shooting crimes? are small in the greater scheme of things.
i'm sorry, i posted after your post to not say anything. sorry about that...
but, you can still see the reasoning why a few shooting crimes? are small in the greater scheme of things.
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
i went through the "long explanation" of freedom and gun rights? and the natural right to self defense? so you could get "some idea" that we are not all "crazy". i think just about EVERYONE knows a women that has been raped, has worked somewhere where the place gets ROBBED multiple times... had their homes broken into. Why should some woman be afraid to walk home late at night after the bar she works at after it closes? with all her tip money? why should she be preyed upon by street criminals or RAPISTS... simply because she is small and wek, and cant afford to live in a rich crime free community?
why should any person, that cant afford to live in luxury and a "nice area", be hounded by criminals that make you empty out your pockets when they see you? thepolice cant protect everyone, all the time, we all know it. I assume even lovely LONDON has its bad areas... and people unfortunate enough to live there, why do the criminals get to KNOW they cant be stopped if they want to prey on people?
no one ever hardly makes a "news story" about crimes that get STOPPED by law abiding citizens with guns. when the "scary man" following the women home? when she pulls her gun out of her purse? and the robber or rapist runs away? theres no news story about it... when someone's grandma shoots ADDICTS breaking into her home to get her pain medication they know she has? when grandma shoots them, they run away, she calls the police?
it doesnt in any way ever make it into your "lovely statistics", does it.
it rarely gets a news story. no one gets to see the "good side of it", ever. WHY> easy... its not a good story...a "good" story SCARES you... the news and the newspapers have a saying that "if it bleeds, it leads".
why should any person, that cant afford to live in luxury and a "nice area", be hounded by criminals that make you empty out your pockets when they see you? thepolice cant protect everyone, all the time, we all know it. I assume even lovely LONDON has its bad areas... and people unfortunate enough to live there, why do the criminals get to KNOW they cant be stopped if they want to prey on people?
no one ever hardly makes a "news story" about crimes that get STOPPED by law abiding citizens with guns. when the "scary man" following the women home? when she pulls her gun out of her purse? and the robber or rapist runs away? theres no news story about it... when someone's grandma shoots ADDICTS breaking into her home to get her pain medication they know she has? when grandma shoots them, they run away, she calls the police?
it doesnt in any way ever make it into your "lovely statistics", does it.
it rarely gets a news story. no one gets to see the "good side of it", ever. WHY> easy... its not a good story...a "good" story SCARES you... the news and the newspapers have a saying that "if it bleeds, it leads".
Well, I understand that, boys... but see, my CAT gets the silly idea you're making fun of HIM... then he gets, *really* mean...
Re: Politicians.
.they CANT call in the national army... they are not ALLOWED to march against AMERICAN CITIZENS..
========================================================================================
our government? answers to US, not the other way around.
Sedders, you really believe those two quotes ? Go and cause hassle at the whitehouse, or any main Governmental or military establishment and you'll soon see who answers to who.
Your population is controlled, as is most of the civilised world, they just let you think you're free because that's more profitable.
"Land Rover, the worlds best 4x4 by far"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
















